Skip to Content
Authors Voils CI, Coffman CJ, Grubber JM, Edelman D, Sadeghpour A, Maciejewski ML, Bolton J, Cho A, Ginsburg GS, Yancy WS
Author Profile(s)
Journal J Gen Intern Med Volume: 30 Issue: 11 Pages: 1591-8
Publish Date 2015 Nov
PubMed ID 25876740
PMC ID 4617940

We examined the clinical utility of supplementing type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) risk counseling with DM genetic test results and counseling.In this randomized controlled trial, non-diabetic overweight/obese veteran outpatients aged 21 to 65 years received DM risk estimates for lifetime risk, family history, and fasting plasma glucose, followed by either genetic test results (CR+G; N = 303) or control eye disease counseling (CR+EYE; N = 298). All participants received brief lifestyle counseling encouraging weight loss to reduce the risk of DM.The mean age was 54 years, 53% of participants were black, and 80% were men. There was no difference between arms in weight (estimated mean difference between CR+G vs. CR+EYE at 3 months = 0.2 kg, 95% CI: -0.3 to 0.7; at 6 months = 0.4 kg, 95 % CI: -0.3 to 1.1), insulin resistance, perceived risk, or physical activity at 3 or 6 months. Calorie and fat intake were lower in the CR+G arm at 3 months (p’s ≤ 0.05) but not at 6 months (p’s > 0.20).Providing patients with genetic test results was not more effective in changing patient behavior to reduce the risk of DM compared to conventional risk NCT01060540

Full Text Full text available on PubMed Central Copyright © 2017 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System