Skip to Content
Authors Burkhart HM, Ashburn DA, Konstantinov IE, De Oliveira NC, De Oliviera NC, Benson L, Williams WG, Van Arsdell GS
Author Profile(s)
Journal J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Volume: 130 Issue: 1 Pages: 61-5
Publish Date 2005 Jul
PubMed ID 15999042
Abstract

We sought to determine whether evolving techniques of aortic arch reconstruction used during the Norwood procedure decreased the incidence of postoperative aortic arch obstruction.Our technique for aortic arch reconstruction in patients undergoing the Norwood procedure has evolved from using an allograft patch (classic group, n = 26) to primary connection of the pulmonary artery and arch (autologous group, n = 20). More recently, we have used a novel technique involving coarctation excision, an extended end-to-end anastomosis on the back of the arch, and a counterincision on the anterior descending aorta to sew in an allograft patch for total arch reconstruction (interdigitating group, n = 33). Cardiac catheterizations performed before stage II palliation were reviewed for aortic diameters at multiple levels in 79 infants (median age, 4.2 months). Aortic arch obstruction was defined as a ratio between the diameters of the arch anastomosis and the descending aorta (coarctation index) of less than 0.7.Overall, 15 (19%) children had aortic arch obstruction. All 15 required aortic intervention (balloon angioplasty, n = 12; surgical patch angioplasty, n = 2; both, n = 1). Aortic arch obstruction rates for the classic, autologous, and interdigitating groups were 46% (n = 12), 15% (n = 3), and 0%, respectively ( P > .001).Reconstruction of the aortic arch with excision of ductal and coarctation tissue is associated with lower aortic arch obstruction rates in patients undergoing the Norwood procedure. Arch reconstruction with a novel interdigitating technique decreases the incidence of aortic arch obstruction.

webmaster@surgery.wisc.edu Copyright © 2016 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System